Talk:Side channel attack
|
|
| Missing image Key-crypto-sideways.png WikiProject on Cryptography | This article is part of WikiProject Cryptography, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to cryptography in the Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. |
|
Pending tasks for [[Template:Articlespace:Side channel attack]]: (https://academickids.com:443/encyclopedia/index.php?title=Talk:Side_channel_attack&action=purge) | edit (https://academickids.com:443/encyclopedia/index.php?title=Talk:Side_channel_attack/to_do&action=edit) - watch (https://academickids.com:443/encyclopedia/index.php?title=Talk:Side_channel_attack/to_do&action=watch) - purge (https://academickids.com:443/encyclopedia/index.php?title=Talk:Side_channel_attack&action=purge) | |
|---|---|---|
What constitutes a side-channel attack?
Matt, I was attempting here to briefly convey (or rather to briefly prevent the conveyance of the inverse) that a break due to a poorly designed crypto system or poor algorithm choice, not merely a mathematical break, are not instances of a side channel attack. Perhaps the confusion is due to insufficient willingness to rewrite?
I'll ponder for a bit and have another try. The category boundaries are worth deliniating I think, and what we have at present isn't very well distinguishing of those boundaries. [User:Ww|ww]] 14:29, 7 Jul 2004 (UTC)
- Yes, but don't mention the various distinctions quite thoroughly in the very next paragraph of the lead; surely that's sufficient? — Matt 14:52, 7 Jul 2004 (UTC)