Talk:Rogers Sportsnet
From Academic Kids
Article lised on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion Apr 29 to May 6 2004, consensus was to keep. Discussion:
Non-notable except that it is media and it exists. Falcon 03:30, Apr 29, 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. A notable television channel. Everyking 04:00, 29 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. I tend to feel that the media, at least, is inherently notable. Isomorphic 04:04, 29 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- Keep, this is like one of the only channels I watch on TV! :) Adam Bishop 04:33, 29 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. Think before you nominate such a major subject. You're wasting everybody's time with this, Falcon. -- user:zanimum
- You're even Canadian, seeing your user page. -- user:zanimum
- Maybe the Rogers building down the street is exerting some kind of control over my brain, but I say Keep. --Phil Larin 17:04, 29 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- Keep, we have many articles on television stations. - SimonP 18:21, Apr 29, 2004 (UTC)
- I've removed the channel assignments (Canada, believe it or not, actually has more than two cable providers!), but otherwise the article is entirely legitimate. Of course, like Phil Larin, I live within view of the Rogers building. But it's still absolutely relevant. Bearcat 07:07, 2 May 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. I've expanded the article a bit. Rdash (t) 20:28, May 2, 2004 (UTC)
End discussion
