Talk:Element naming controversy
From Academic Kids
"Seaborg proved that it was a misreading" is a strong statement especially taking into account that he had a conflict of interests. Apparently IUPAC has a different view. Any references?
I changed "proved" -> "claimed" since nobody came with a reference.
The pages for elements 111 through 115 all link here, but this page has no mention of them. What's the deal with them? (I hope they keep their current names. The atomic symbol for Unununium is Uuu. How cool is that?) -Branddobbe 07:54, Apr 15, 2004 (UTC)
- Yep, it makes no sense. The links should have been to Systematic element name instead, which has the link to this page. Jay 10:44, 15 Apr 2004 (UTC)
