Talk:2000
|
|
Oops! the year 2000 Academy Awards results were, of course, the year 2001 winners, the Academy Awards pages should be reformatted soon for more clarity. --Neeklamy
Oughtn't this page to be in decade 1990's? Fi 19:14 Jan 24, 2003 (UTC) The sports section is somewhat biased towards the USA! markb
Ack. Can we please delete that ugly calendar, or at least move it to the bottom of the page? RickK | Talk 01:49, 14 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- I have removed it. It was ugly and no other year pages seem to have it, so I don't see why 2000 should be the odd one out. -- Popsracer 05:39, 18 Mar 2004 (UTC)
Removed bullet in "see also" box as per discussion on Wikipedia:WikiProject_Years --(talk to)BozMo 16:02, 16 May 2004 (UTC)
I've tentatively added a navbox template to replace the rather unattractive navigational elements at the top of the page. Dicussion at WikiProject Years (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Years#Year_Navbox). -- Seth Ilys 23:49, 24 May 2004 (UTC)
Huh? 2000 wasn't a leap year... Ashibaka ✎ 22:47, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Yes, it definitely was (as all years divisible by 400 are)—Trevor Caira 16:04, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Can't find this page on 'Pages needing attention'. Does the notice still apply? Btljs
I couldn't find it there either, because that page doesn't have specific requests. Maybe it did once. I tidied a bit anyway. Robin Patterson 05:57, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)