Hasty generalization
From Academic Kids
Hasty generalization, also known as "fallacy of insufficient statistics", "fallacy of insufficient sample", "fallacy of the lonely fact", "leaping to a conclusion", "hasty induction" or "secundum quid", is the logical fallacy of reaching an inductive generalization based on too little evidence.
Examples:
- "I loved the hit song, therefore I'll love the album it's on." (Fallacious because the album might have one good song and lots of filler.)
- "This Web site looks OK to me on my computer; therefore, it will look OK on your computer, too." (My screen size is smaller than yours, and I'm using a computer in a public library, so I can't adjust it!)
- "In my lifetime, there has been a leap year every fourth year; therefore, every fourth year, past, present, and future, is a leap year." (Not true; see the leap year article.)
- "My dog is black. Therefore, all dogs must be black."
See also faulty generalization for other fallacies involving generalization.
[edit]
External links and references
- Fallacy: Hasty Generalization (http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/hasty-generalization.html), Michael C. Labossiere's Fallacy Tutorial Prohe:הכללה_חפוזה
